HBM News
Kentish News
Council News
« AGM - Change of Date | Main | Making allowances »

It's Kitewood. Again.

Yes folks, it's Kitewood. The people who brought us Altira Tumbleweed Park, and didn't bring us a new Blacksole Bridge. The people who said they would bring us a new Blacksole Bridge if they could have a huge swathe of Beltinge to play with.

To be honest, I don't think we're any closer to getting a bridge, but Kitewood are starting to nibble away at the open spaces of Beltinge, laying the foundations of "Kitegate" a development area the size of Hampton.

They've got their eyes on the eastern end of Kitegate, where they hope to knock up 40 homes on farmland, much to the annoyance of the local residents who thought they would be living next to, er, farmland.

Our lives will be ruined if more homes are built

Hundreds of angry parents fear their children's lives could be put at risk if a new housing development is built in Beltinge.

Concerned families on the Castle Chase estate are furious with plans to use their neighbourhood as the only access route to a proposed 40-home plot off Puffin Road. They claim an extra 500 vehicles will drive through the estate every day, passing four play parks, if the development on farmland gets the thumbs up. Anthony Palmer, of Puffin Road, is among almost 100 people who have written objection letters. He said:

"This would have a devastating impact on what is a very happy and settled road. Children play completely happily in the play area outside my house. With the addition of at least another 500 vehicle journeys a day this will compromise this environment and put their lives at greater risk."

Neighbour Keith Roberts added:

"There are approximately 25 children under the age of 16 in Puffin Road alone, where we feel they can play in a very safe and secure environment. This would not be the case with heavy plant vehicles coming through the road on a daily basis."

Most people on the estate appear happy for new homes to be built, but object to Puffin Road being used as the only access route. They say older roads to the north of the site are much wider and should be used. Trevor Higgs, of Puffin Road, said:

"I understand the residents of Roseberry Avenue, Rowland Crescent and Richmond Drive will most certainly raise objections to their roads being used in a similar fashion and I fully understand their concern. However, these roads are far more suited and in closer proximity to the estate."

A similar application on the same site was knocked back in 2003, with planners saying there was already enough housing land in the area. The decision was appealed unsuccessfully by developers Kitewood Estates in 2005. Local councillor Gabrielle Davis supported the objection at the time of the appeals She said:

"I was assured afterwards that the site would be taken off the local plan as there was, and continues to be, enough housing for local needs. It is an open space and should remain protected for future generations."

Kitewood planning manager Paul Watkins said Puffin Road was earmarked as an access route when the Castle Chase estate was built. He said:

"The planning consent included a condition that access could be provided from Puffin Road. The application site is also allocated as a reserve housing site for 40 dwellings in the Canterbury District Plan First Review, which was adopted in 2006. Our own engineers have tested the suitability of Puffin Road to access the site for 40 dweilinqs and found no issues."

A decision on the outline planning application is expected to made in the next few months.

HB Gazette 9th June 2011

Here are the planning documents - just click to view.

Visit for more

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

As a resident of Castle Chase, I have to ask why Kitewood are so insistant on having access through Castle Chase. I do think that they wish to piggy-back off the attractive surroundings of Castle Chase. However, Kitewood's existing housing stock in Beltinge is clearly not built to the same standard and the roads in Barnes Way still don't appear to have been completed properly. This seems to be a cynical ploy to lure buyers with the promise of "look, this is an example of what you'll be getting" when in fact they had nothing to do with the Castle Chase development.

Also, how will they justify the fact that all residents of Castle Chase are expected to pay an annual maintenence fee for landscaping and playgrounds and yet Kitewood, a commercial enterprise, wants to use them as a selling point. Presumably the new residents, since they will be passing by the facilities daily, will want to use them too. Can I assume that my annual fee will be heavily subsidised by Kitewood should their plans be approved?

Lastly, hindsight is a wonderful thing but all possible routes into these 40 homes were built as dead-ends that can be converted rather than an unshiftable 'fan' of houses - purely to hedge bets and allow the realisation of such plans at some time in the future. Sadly I fear it's a case of when, not if, these homes are built.
Fri, January 6, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterBothered in Beltinge

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.