* * * * DONATE * * * * Support NoNightFlights

Comments
Thanet Blogs



Tweets

* except "AHEM" flights: Aid, Humanitarian, Emergency, Military


You can make a donation to support our work... just click the button below.

« Thanet Airport Working Party 4th April | Main | Silencing the politicians »
Thursday
Apr052012

Herne Bay people power

Congratulations to Herne Bay for a clear-cut response to the night flight proposals - "No thank you!".

If you have never heard of Peter Vickery-Jones, he is a Herne Bay councillor and holder of the Transport Portfolio for Canterbury City Council. In this article he complains that "Local activists have criticised this council for failing to respond to Manston's proposals". Unthinkable!

Anyone familiar with the process would know that CCC (themselves only a consultee) had committed themselves to assessing the responses from within the District before presenting their own response to TDC. Mind you, it would have been nice if the councillor had gone along to the KIACC meeting after the night flights proposal was published - as it was, Canterbury District wasn't represented.

Another opportunity we missed out on was Manston's consultation on flight paths and holding patterns - Canterbury Council were an official consultee, and got a nudging reminder email just before the end of the 14 week process. Unfortunately, it seems nobody cared enough about what happens in Canterbury's airspace to send in a response.


Plans for night flights from Manston have been shot down by residents in Herne Bay who have rejected the proposal in a consultation organised by the city council. Around 230 people responded to the survey, the vast majority complaining about the potential for noise and disturbance and overstated economic benefits.

Now the city council has sent a formal objection to Thanet District Council after members of the executive agreed last week that the proposals by the airport operator Infratil were unacceptable. Cllr Peter Vickery-Jones told members:

"Local activists have criticised this council for failing to respond to Manston's proposals but this is the first opportunity we have had. It’s not our fault because we have had to await the results of our consultation. If night flights are not good for Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted, then why Manston?"

The executive agreed to support the continued role of Manston in the "economic well being" of east Kent but believed the adverse impact on residents of night flying was not justified.

HB Gazette 5th April 2012

Reader Comments (3)

As someone who has written to as many councillors as humanly possible, I can confirm that THEY ARE ALL USELESS and have done NOTHING to stop night flights. Now that they have seen the great publicity around Tesco's defeat in Herne, they want to jump on the bandwagon and claim victory over the airport.

I never saw one at a meeting either.

They are a pathetic waste of space and now THEY think it's a good idea to fly over the sea !!!!!!!
Sat, April 14, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterMISTER B
Dear HBM

I was interested to read the rest of what 'MISTER B comments on Herne Bay people power ' had to say, but clicking on it reveals that no comments have been posted on this topic.

Could you tell me if the post was left elsewhere? Thanks.
SiR
Sat, April 14, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterSleeplessinRamsgate
Thanks - it's appeared now
SiR
Sat, April 14, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterSleeplessinRamsgate

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.