No case for night flights
Something of the night
They must be bats, wanting to fly in the dark. Not in the squeaky, blood-sucking sense. Just a bit nutso. Re-tune your ears and minds to human frequencies and I'll explain...
At the end of last year, Infratil published their draft MasterPlan, spelling out their hopes and dreams for the coming years. The projected growth in freight and passenger volumes is staggering. Both Thanet District Council and the CPRE were critical of the plan. The document will now rattle back and forth until an agreed final draft is produced, about September 2009.
In a separate but related development, Infratil (who were hoping to win a contract with BAWC) pushed TDC into changes to the Section 106 Agreement at very short notice. These changes would have allowed them a number of night flights to support the BAWC contract. This had the effect of drawing attention to the consequences of increased traffic through Manston. The BAWC deal fell through, and Thanet Council are now starting to draw up a pre-emptive night flying policy that will see them through until 2018.
With me so far? OK. But...
A lot of keen and clever people have spent a lot of time studying planes and airports. Much head-banging, hair-pulling, teeth-gnashing, midnight oil-burning... you get the picture. All this hard work has been condensed down into reports, analyses and presentations which we can all get hold of - we don't have to re-do all that slog.
The aviation group of the Local Government Association reports that “no evidence has been produced by the Government or the aviation industry to justify claims that night flights have an overall economic benefit”. That sentence is worth re-reading and thinking about. The LGA, which covers the whole country, but is focussed on local interests and priorities has a 'Strategic Aviation Special Interest Group'. They've done their homework, they've done their sums, and they've come to the conclusion that night flights don't make economic sense.
The World Health Organisation has found that people's health is damaged if their sleep is reduced or disrupted by noise. This wouldn't just affect those under the loudest part of the aircrafts' noise footprint - it would affect everyone within earshot.
In earlier applications for night flying, promises have been made that flights would be going in and out to the west of Manston, thus avoiding the more densely populated parts of east Kent. The key phrase in all those promises is "weather permitting".
Fact: most of the time the wind in Britain is westerly or south-westerly. Fact: for safety reasons, pilots prefer to land into the wind. So the most sincere of promises, made with the best of intentions, will come to nought if the wind's blowing in the wrong direction. The night flights would be coming in low over Ramsgate and Thanet to land at Manston. Lots of voters, waking up grumpy, needlessly.
Matt Clarke has said that Manston is operating at a fraction of its capacity, so there can be no need for them to operate night flights. There's plenty of available runway time throughout the daylight hours: surely it would make sense to use that up first.
No economic benefit; proven health cost; vote-loser; unnecessary. The Airport Working Group's recommendations onthe proposed night-time flying operations from 2010-2018 should be pretty straightforward: don't.
AWP, BAWC, Bats, CPRE, MasterPlan, Matt Clarke, Ramsgate, S106 Infratil, Manston, Night flights, TDC
Reader Comments (2)
Ah, but is this the same Airport Working Party that has only recently decided that it might be a good idea to build a working relationship with the statutory consultative body on all matters Manston-y, i.e. KIACC? Is this the same Airport Working Party whose evil masters @ TDC prevented KIACC from addressing councillors at the recent decision-making meeting re night flights and the S106 alteration? The TDC Agenda item paper that introduces this night flying policy idea to the AWP says "The Working Party may also be informed by the fact that the Council felt able in February to support a certain number of aircraft movements between the hours 06.00 – 07.00, and between 23.00 and 23.30 hours." Sound like a done deal to you? I'm certainly not hearing any desire to listen to facts, look at good quality research, and to think this thing through from scratch.
Have added you to the recent posts on http://thanetonline.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow" rel="nofollow">http://thanetonline.blogspot.com/ sidebar and will do some sort of airport related post later today.