HBM News
Kentish News
Council News
« Cycling on the Promenade | Main | Humberts Leisure report on the Pier »

Blacksole Bridge is a daily risk

Call for footbridge at crossing

A busy road bridge has been described as a "death trap" by a Beltinge walking group. Blacksole Bridge, which links Altira Business Park and Beltinge, has no footpath, but is the only pedestrian access across the railway line. Veronica Kemp, who organises the Beltinge Happy Strollers' weekly walks from the nearby Miramar Care Home, is greatly concerned by the risks pedestrians face on a daily basis as they cross the busy bridge. She said:

"When the business park was granted planning permission in 2003, among the conditions was the construction of a shared walking and cycling bridge. This was agreed to be done when 17,000 sq metres of commercial floor space had been completed, but currently only 2,500 sq metres have been completed."

Miss Kemp, of The Horshams, has watched traffic levels increase across the bridge since 2003.

"The bridge has been a danger to cross for years, but ever since more people have been using Altira Business Park and more buildings have gone up, the situation has got a lot worse. Why the council ever agreed planning permission before this was dealt with I can't imagine. I personally refuse to cross the bridge now that it has become so very busy, and before very long there is going to be a very bad accident there."

The park has also been earmarked as a site for hundreds of new houses to be built, alongside more commercial and retail premises. City council spokesman Rob Davies confirmed provision of a new bridge still remains a condition of the original planning permission for Altira Business Park's development. He said:

"The applicant has put forward a new proposal to provide traffic management on the existing bridge through a traffic light system, as an alternative to a new bridge. This would be a single file system for cars alongside a shared footpath/cycleway. The details are currently being considered by Kent County Council and the applicant's transport advisers."

HB Gazette 2010-02-25

Visit for more

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (1)

So if Kitewood didn't own the land, the bridge would still remain a danger, and who would foot the bill then, the LA, and indirectly us, all the local residents. It appears the ones being greedy are indeed us the residents, we want something for nothing, maybe there's a compromise to have here, maybe, just maybe the developer can cut back on its plans, has anyone bothered to ask them?
There is without a doubt a shortage of housing across the area, the County and indeed the Country, but unfortunately the NIMBYs are on the war path and think only of themselves. I admit I don't fancy such a large development on my doorstep, but surely we can afford some more housing, for those that need it, and it will bring employment in the area, to those that need it, and a new school, for those that need it. Welcome to the real world, and actually Kitewood, if any of you bother to look are not one of the big players in the world of developers.
Tue, October 11, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterMary Winter

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.