Too much traffic...

The developers propose to improve access to the A299. Increased traffic from this proposed new town may turn left instead of turning right, and there we have Reculver Road. Pity the people who live near the junction by the school. Reculver Road is quite busy as it is. The increase in vehicles, (some families can have 3 cars; my neighbour has 4) will make local roads intolerable. I can envisage single and some double yellow lines along the length of the road.

I feel this developement is totally out of proportion for this area and farmland will be lost. Housing should be built closer to large towns to facilitate employment and reduce travel. I am therefore anti. I vote NO

Mick, 6th Nov 2011

I'm all for it

Got one of your leaflets on public meeting at Kings hall. First of all I do not agree its unwanted development, what about the shortage of housing and jobs in England? Its not as if this space is the only green space around.

If you put Hillborough in the midle of a six mile radius left and right (road atlas britain) you have hardly nothing to the right accept Reculver untill Minnis bay, accept sea views and green fields. Sweeping inwards through to Sarre, Upstreet, Grove you have marshes and open countryside. Westbere you have lakes and rivers then on to Broadoak and Tylerhill more countryside and woods, then Cloweswood, Thorndenwood, Bleanwood, which is about THREE times the size of Herne bay. Then back to the coast Swalecliffe on the left of Hillborough and more open space and sea.

How do I feel "fantastic" hope it gets the go ahead. 1000s of jobs, Good for the economy, more homes Britain needs badly.

Click to read more ...

Enough is enough

We are completely against the proposed development. We have already been lumbered with the estate at Hillborough which has seen too much traffic in Beltinge (VILLAGE) and along Bishopstone Lane - dog-walkers going to the cliffs, so we don't want any more.

When we moved here 14 years ago there was a quiet village existence but not now. There is no infrastructure - schools, sewage works, bus service and a further 1,300 properties (and 1,300+ cars) will need all this, and possibly another doctor's surgery (we can't get in to see a doctor now).

I don't suppose our comments will make the slightest difference as once this crappy council has made up its mind it will go ahead. What's next - building behind the surgery along Bishopstone Lane???

See you at the meeting

Mrs M, 4th Nov 2011

Concerns: traffic, doctors...

Yes, we should like to save Hillborough, like many other people who moved to this district, the reason was to be away from housing estates and be near country and sea. When we moved to Bishopstone 20 years ago there was a caravan site at Hillborough and farmland and farm shop.

We now have a housing estate with more vehicles on the road, which has no speed limit as has Maypole and Broomfield, therefore, Hillborough and Beltinge are just race tracks for cars.

So what will happen if we have another 1,000 house built very near to this estate, people will want to use the road through Beltinge and thereabouts to reach the beach and local shops. We have to wait in some cases 2 weeks to see a particular Doctor we would like, meaning we do not need even more people using both medical centres. Schools are another issue where would children go for schools?

We have no buses after 7.00 p.m.and they are every hour through Beltinge and Hillborough, in spite of the existing houses, so who would want to move into these houses if there is no convenient way of travelling into Herne Bay, Margate etc.

DR, Bishopstone, 3rd Nov 2011

Concerns: scale, infrastructure, employment...

Our concerns are:

• Firstly the development is far too large as 1,000 homes possibly more we are lead to understand will be built.
• The infrastructure in place could not sustain the this amount of houses and indeed say at least another 4,000 persons in this area.
• Where are they going to work - there is no work down here to cater for this vast amount of new persons.
• It has been said by the developers that they will be employed at the new industrial site they have built but all we understand are hi tech industries and I cannot believe that all the above possibly 4000 persons are in hi-tech occupations. Many will have to commute to London or other main towns in the area to find work.
• There will be a vast input of motor vehicles in this immediate area making the back lanes very dangerous indeed and as has already been quoted it will take somebody to be knocked down and possibly killed before it is brought to the attention of the authorities.
• The developers have stated that they will make available the land for a new school but are not going to pay for it.

My wife and I only moved down to Bishopstone in March of this year and we are concerned that this development has suddenly come to light. Our searches from Canterbury City Council did not give any indication that a development of this size was in the pipeline. The developers must have had some outline planning in place. But as stated our Searches Were Clear of any Development in the immediate Area. How could this be?

To sum up my wife and I are totally against this development which will spoil the beautiful countryside and would wish you to put us on the supporters list with immediate effect.

DD, Bishopstone, 3rd Nov 2011